Skip to main content

Indy Theater Creates Gentrification

Economic analysis of NYC's current takeover by the 1%. It used to be the land of Patti Smith, but now she tells all the artists to find a new city.

Joseph Steiglitz ( and his book :"Rewriting the Rules of the American Economy") is on Leonard Lopate's WNYC show right now.  The US has the highest level of income inequality, it's the rules & policies which are systematically creating these conditions.  He's saying that the idea of pulling yourself up by your bootstraps, the "American Dream" is dead.  And not because of the ideas we market to ourselves or the politics we cling to.  It happens little by little, because of laws and bills that are designed to protect Market Power (see the simple concept of "Perfect Competition").


The same concepts can apply to theater. "Ladies & Gentlemen, Lower Your Prices?"! The article discusses why theaters raise prices. They do, and scare away exactly the audiences they are looking for.  The adventurous ones who are willing to see something weird & experiment-y. Broadway is the most "polished" (i.e. BORING) theater experience you can have, but is "valued" in direct proportion to the ticket price or "perceived desire-ability". Tickets for "The Producers" or "Book of Mormon" were hot at a certain time, but all that buzz (and the top-dollar) has disappeared.

I personally witnessed the change of neighborhood of the Lower East Side.   I worked the first years of the NYC Fringe on Ludlow street. The neighborhood was full of unwanted stores, generations of Jewish immigrants and dusty candy-stores had died out, and everything was cheap.  The biggest cost was renovation. "The Piano Store" was called that because we couldn't take the sign down (too much time and expense). That was the turn of the century.  Now there is a giant hotel and the neighborhood has been renovated into shiny, cold metal structures with no history.  Even the people have been scrubbed of memories.

Pay attention to the larger trends.  Micro-decisions turn into major leanings. There is a reason that the Hollywood trope of "success" leaves the star feeling empty. The society has defaulted into gaining more money, to its own peril.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turn to Tech Scam

I recently had an interaction with a company called  Turn To Tech , who are offering to train people and then postponing payment until after you've gotten a job. Standard, right? Except their pitch is heavy on the sales and less on the info.  I filled out a simple, online form and their first email response was: "Are you available to come in to discuss the course?  The class is a pay after you receive a job type of course, however it will require some pre-work assessment , etc.  That can be gone over with you when you come in.  " Of course? Standard grammar not required. "A-Pay-After-You-Receive-A-Job-Type" of course.  Of course, you could call it an "Income Based Payment". I had to ask 3 more times how much the class would be before and after. "It is $6,000 before the course is complete if you do not want to approach the pay after you receive a job, which is $9,000."  This makes the government look good. Get me back my 6.7% rate...

Network is the Broadway Play Worth Watching

Of all the big plays of the moment, no play does a better homage to the spirit of the tale than Network-currently starring Bryan Cranston.  It’s a perfect American story-created in England. The surrounding immersive media is just the beginning.  The line “I’m Mad as Hell” is presented perfectly the first time, and then highlighted as a regular battle cry-you wonder if this is made from a movie from the 1970’s (it was) or if it was written tomorrow. It takes too much of the insanity of the media-centric world to too many logical conclusions. It plays with your mind over and over, as if media is just an extended magic trick-constantly diverting your attention. For this play, it’s worth it to pay attention.

Usability of Online Surveys

I just got an email request to do a survey from a FAVORITE museum.  They sent me an email, addressed me as "Dear Friend". What could go wrong? They said it would take 15 minutes.  (Which is a LOT.  A lot for anyone.  Anything more than 5 minutes is a lot.)  It took longer than 15 minutes.  I lost track when the Progress Bar hadn't moved beyond the half way point after I answered a lot of questions. I left the tab open all day.  Checked in, did a few more answers every now and then.  Not even sure if it mattered after 5 hours.  When I got to the "Just a few quick demographic questions"  (again, not past the halfway mark on the Progress Bar). What got to me was the BAD design of the survey.  In terms of actions and GOMS (Goals, Operators, Methods and Selections) which is essentially a way to measure how long it takes to go from a mouse to a keyboard.  If you add it up, it matters.  Especially if you have a survey wit...