Skip to main content

UX Job Market

There are LOTS of definitions of "User Experience" as a field.

And then also, LOTS of definitions in terms of expectations of what the job should entail.  Most companies don't have a "mature vision" of what to expect, or how to integrate the UX person into their larger product cycle.

I was trained to look at the overall picture, always get input from the end-user and to keep in mind the business requirements.  Also, from the business POV, to keep in mind the ENTIRE Customer Experience within the overall process.  The customer clicks a buy button online, but every interaction with the brand prior to that is a huge influence.  The abandonment rate does not exist only online.

When you hear about "growing job opportunities" within the UX field, most are for short term contracts described below. Note to the beginning UX'er: BEWARE!!

Quoting from an email on a (closed) UX professionals listserv:

"Sadly, the majority of companies here still have a shockingly poor level of understanding and many wrong assumptions about what we do (same goes for most of the recruiters). Consequently, there are as many if not more short term contract openings than permanent positions. Contracting companies expect a UX-er to parachute in for 3-6 months, learn what needs to be done by osmosis, play analyst, evangelizer, product manager, then kick out great designs (and production quality code, in many cases)."

These calls require a person to be a Developer/Coder AND a Designer AND a Researcher AND an expert in the product AND  . . .  It's terrific if you can do 2 roles at once, but be aware that the other roles will suffer.  You may not notice this until a certain overwhelming feeling comes over you and you realize there are not 48 hours in a day.

You are set up for failure by the very length of the contract.  Companies expect you to work magic on one project, and even if you do-there is not always funding for your role on the next one.  Just when you have managed to negotiate every turn and are an expert at the office politics, you find yourself in the revolving door.  As if the nature of the job were more focused on a Magic Wand, rather than a deep understanding of the product and user.

Look for companies who have a TEAM of UX people, or a firm which focuses on research (Bentley's Design & Usability Center) and lets the firm negotiate the politics for you.  If you are the only UX person in the entire company, you definitely have your work cut out for you.  (Another phrase to be wary of!)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turn to Tech Scam

I recently had an interaction with a company called  Turn To Tech , who are offering to train people and then postponing payment until after you've gotten a job. Standard, right? Except their pitch is heavy on the sales and less on the info.  I filled out a simple, online form and their first email response was: "Are you available to come in to discuss the course?  The class is a pay after you receive a job type of course, however it will require some pre-work assessment , etc.  That can be gone over with you when you come in.  " Of course? Standard grammar not required. "A-Pay-After-You-Receive-A-Job-Type" of course.  Of course, you could call it an "Income Based Payment". I had to ask 3 more times how much the class would be before and after. "It is $6,000 before the course is complete if you do not want to approach the pay after you receive a job, which is $9,000."  This makes the government look good. Get me back my 6.7% rate...

Network is the Broadway Play Worth Watching

Of all the big plays of the moment, no play does a better homage to the spirit of the tale than Network-currently starring Bryan Cranston.  It’s a perfect American story-created in England. The surrounding immersive media is just the beginning.  The line “I’m Mad as Hell” is presented perfectly the first time, and then highlighted as a regular battle cry-you wonder if this is made from a movie from the 1970’s (it was) or if it was written tomorrow. It takes too much of the insanity of the media-centric world to too many logical conclusions. It plays with your mind over and over, as if media is just an extended magic trick-constantly diverting your attention. For this play, it’s worth it to pay attention.

Henry David Thoreau is Alive and Well, Despite All the Murderers

Despite his famous grave at Sleepy Hollow, HDT is alive and well. There are countless books, events, plays being read, written, performed and published about him every year. The "interpretations" take on various permutations.  Live-action humans who lead educational programs, or people who write books for children.  Or, theater which extends the documented & literary materials into personal immediacy (not that I am biased, but this is what I do). Lately, there has also been a video game created about Walden. And a young graphic designer who wants to "update" Thoreau's words for the modern age.  Something about "how dated the language is" and the "inaccessibility" of its ideas.  (I can't bear to include a link, or even the designer's name for fear of adding to publicity, and thereby adding "support") The last example is the slippery slope.  At what point does he need to be repackaged, yet again? Instead of taki...