Skip to main content

Conflating Neuromarketing, SEO and UX

Sometimes, ideas from Graphic Art of the 1950's resurface as modern science, without considering the time difference between then and now.  The idea is to get the brand into the mind of the consumer.  The more they recognize it, the likelier they are to pick it up off the grocery shelves.

Fast Company has some ideas about the field of Neuromarketing.

And why professionals need to jump on it.

It starts by discussing how SEO is about "Search Engine Optimization", but it should be about "Social Engagement Optimization".  Which becomes problematic when you read more of the argument as it devolves from "quality content" to the conclusion about simplifying everything and appealing to emotion.  Rather than something frivolous, like reason.

 There is some "fuzzy science" about definitions:
"neuromarketing is a science that’s based on the fact that 95% of all thoughts, emotions, and learning occur before we are ever aware of it"

This is true.  In UX, we call this Pre-Attentive Processing, what the eye and brain absorb before our conscious mind catches up.  It gets measured in milliseconds of time, not brain capacity (how did they come up with that, anyway?).

"That means most of us are actually only talking to 5% of our potential customers’ brains!  Fortunately, scientists are able to study just what kind of marketing hits that other 95% of our brains in the right way,"
Since customers make their decisions based on such low bandwidth, we need to DUMB EVERYTHING DOWN.

Advice continues as follows: (paraphrasing slightly)
Make it about them.
Short & sweet.
Play to their emotions.

and here are some quotes:
"Seeing is Better than Reading"
"Stay Simple"

Use pretty pictures, preferably of humans, for that empathy thing, y'know?  And don't use too many words.

To make it worse, it seems the post was inspired by a piece in the New York Times.

"There has also been much discussion lately about the rewiring that is happening to our brains because of our constant interaction with computers and smartphones. This interaction is further reducing our attention spans, which is pushing overworked and overcommitted American consumers to make purchasing and other decisions more quickly. The upshot is that people want information but they want it baby style — pureed to its most basic and served simply."

So in other words, you are "helping" those poor overcommitted consumers/suckers to click the "Buy" button on your product before they have a chance to think about it.

Except that isn't how people purchase things on the internet.  Trust, as displayed in design, is still a huge concept.  Offering advice like "baby style" to the entire marketing, online and information community is just plain irresponsible and underestimates the entire potential audience.  And encourages  even shorter attention spans, because there is just no deeper analysis or content to find.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turn to Tech Scam

I recently had an interaction with a company called  Turn To Tech , who are offering to train people and then postponing payment until after you've gotten a job. Standard, right? Except their pitch is heavy on the sales and less on the info.  I filled out a simple, online form and their first email response was: "Are you available to come in to discuss the course?  The class is a pay after you receive a job type of course, however it will require some pre-work assessment , etc.  That can be gone over with you when you come in.  " Of course? Standard grammar not required. "A-Pay-After-You-Receive-A-Job-Type" of course.  Of course, you could call it an "Income Based Payment". I had to ask 3 more times how much the class would be before and after. "It is $6,000 before the course is complete if you do not want to approach the pay after you receive a job, which is $9,000."  This makes the government look good. Get me back my 6.7% rate...

Network is the Broadway Play Worth Watching

Of all the big plays of the moment, no play does a better homage to the spirit of the tale than Network-currently starring Bryan Cranston.  It’s a perfect American story-created in England. The surrounding immersive media is just the beginning.  The line “I’m Mad as Hell” is presented perfectly the first time, and then highlighted as a regular battle cry-you wonder if this is made from a movie from the 1970’s (it was) or if it was written tomorrow. It takes too much of the insanity of the media-centric world to too many logical conclusions. It plays with your mind over and over, as if media is just an extended magic trick-constantly diverting your attention. For this play, it’s worth it to pay attention.

Henry David Thoreau is Alive and Well, Despite All the Murderers

Despite his famous grave at Sleepy Hollow, HDT is alive and well. There are countless books, events, plays being read, written, performed and published about him every year. The "interpretations" take on various permutations.  Live-action humans who lead educational programs, or people who write books for children.  Or, theater which extends the documented & literary materials into personal immediacy (not that I am biased, but this is what I do). Lately, there has also been a video game created about Walden. And a young graphic designer who wants to "update" Thoreau's words for the modern age.  Something about "how dated the language is" and the "inaccessibility" of its ideas.  (I can't bear to include a link, or even the designer's name for fear of adding to publicity, and thereby adding "support") The last example is the slippery slope.  At what point does he need to be repackaged, yet again? Instead of taki...